Page 2 of 2

Re: Mckayla Maroney, Elle Fanning and Bella Thorne

PostPosted: Sat Sep 20, 2014 10:53 am
by Sanity
Merciful wrote:Can somebody send me a link or file?


You do realize they're underaged right?

Re: Mckayla Maroney, Elle Fanning and Bella Thorne

PostPosted: Sat Sep 20, 2014 11:28 am
by groot
by VicePresident » Sat Sep 20, 2014 4:51 pm

Merciful wrote:
Can somebody send me a link or file?



Of child porn? I don't have it sorry.


Post by Sanity » Sat Sep 20, 2014 4:53 pm

Merciful wrote:
Can somebody send me a link or file?


You do realize they're underaged right?




Take it easy guys, some of us might be under 18, you don't know. And im not saying it´s right, but it´s normal for a 16-18 kid to watch naked girls the same age.

Re: Mckayla Maroney, Elle Fanning and Bella Thorne

PostPosted: Sat Sep 20, 2014 11:36 am
by VicePresident
groot wrote:Take it easy guys, some of us might be under 18, you don't know. And im not saying it´s right, but it´s normal for a 16-18 kid to watch naked girls the same age.



It's still child porn. A 17 year old with 17 year old nudes can still be charged. And some girls even get charged for distributing it.

Re: Mckayla Maroney, Elle Fanning and Bella Thorne

PostPosted: Sat Sep 20, 2014 11:43 am
by Sanity
groot wrote:
Post by Sanity » Sat Sep 20, 2014 4:53 pm

Merciful wrote:
Can somebody send me a link or file?


You do realize they're underaged right?




Take it easy guys, some of us might be under 18, you don't know. And im not saying it´s right, but it´s normal for a 16-18 kid to watch naked girls the same age.



My point was that if anyone sent him the pictures, it would be considered "Distributing Child Pornography" and therefore he'd be asking someone to break the law. I wasn't trying to say that it's not right for him to want to see them if he is the same age necessarily.

Re: Mckayla Maroney, Elle Fanning and Bella Thorne

PostPosted: Sat Sep 20, 2014 11:47 am
by wigglybutt1
as someone said even underage girls take nude pics of themselves are getting in trouble.

Re: Mckayla Maroney, Elle Fanning and Bella Thorne

PostPosted: Sat Sep 20, 2014 12:00 pm
by groot
by VicePresident » Sat Sep 20, 2014 5:36 pm
It's still child porn. A 17 year old with 17 year old nudes can still be charged. And some girls even get charged for distributing it.


by Sanity » Sat Sep 20, 2014 5:43 pm
My point was that if anyone sent him the pictures, it would be considered "Distributing Child Pornography" and therefore he'd be asking someone to break the law. I wasn't saying trying to say that it's not right for him to want to see them if he is the same age or younger.


Post by wigglybutt1 » Sat Sep 20, 2014 5:47 pm
as someone said even underage girls take nude pics of themselves are getting in trouble.


Understand all that, i´m with you 100%. I was just saying not all are old educated pervs like us lol. Some are young and need to be taught, hence the take it easy. I didn´t want you to get me wrong. :?