Kim Kardashian (???) - Paper Magazine

Post sexy/kinky/naughty non-leak images of celebrities here. They can be screen grabs from movies, official red carpet pics, magazine scans, etc.

Moderators: snapsnap, Wicked

Kim Kardashian (???) - Paper Magazine

Postby wip1968 » Wed Nov 12, 2014 8:54 pm

Here's Kim Kardashian's Paper Magazine shoot...

https://imgur.com/a/YjAgZ/layout/grid

Image Image Image Image

Note: my posts/links are not my own albums. I source and simply repost what I find.
wip1968
 
Posts: 519
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 5:08 pm

Re: Kim Kardashian (???) - Paper Magazine

Postby mjones19 » Thu Nov 13, 2014 8:43 am

wip1968 wrote:Here's Kim Kardashian's Paper Magazine shoot...

https://imgur.com/a/YjAgZ/layout/grid

Image Image Image Image

Note: my posts/links are not my own albums. I source and simply repost what I find.

I said it before and I'll say it again, some celebs are pissed that they didn't get hacked lol. Nicee
mjones19
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 9:58 am

Re: Kim Kardashian (???) - Paper Magazine

Postby wip1968 » Thu Nov 13, 2014 8:47 am

mjones19 wrote:I said it before and I'll say it again, some celebs are pissed that they didn't get hacked lol. Nicee


Either that or they want to get naked on their own terms knowing they've got hacked nudes out there. By going nude publicly, they hope it will lower the value and interest of any hacked nudes that may release. We've seen Kim K., the recent Kiera Knightly for "Interview"...
wip1968
 
Posts: 519
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 5:08 pm

Re: Kim Kardashian (???) - Paper Magazine

Postby Ghost » Thu Nov 13, 2014 9:23 am

wip1968 wrote:
mjones19 wrote:I said it before and I'll say it again, some celebs are pissed that they didn't get hacked lol. Nicee


Either that or they want to get naked on their own terms knowing they've got hacked nudes out there. By going nude publicly, they hope it will lower the value and interest of any hacked nudes that may release. We've seen Kim K., the recent Kiera Knightly for "Interview"...


Also so they can actually get paid for it. Imagine how much Jennifer Lawrence would have been paid for even one nude scene. If she ever decides to go nude in a photoshoot, movie, or something along those lines, her payment will be significantly less than what it would have been. That's why I think all these celebrities are going nude now.
Image
User avatar
Ghost
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 4:49 am
Location: In your heart

Re: Kim Kardashian (???) - Paper Magazine

Postby mjones19 » Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:15 pm

Ghost wrote:
wip1968 wrote:
mjones19 wrote:I said it before and I'll say it again, some celebs are pissed that they didn't get hacked lol. Nicee


Either that or they want to get naked on their own terms knowing they've got hacked nudes out there. By going nude publicly, they hope it will lower the value and interest of any hacked nudes that may release. We've seen Kim K., the recent Kiera Knightly for "Interview"...


Also so they can actually get paid for it. Imagine how much Jennifer Lawrence would have been paid for even one nude scene. If she ever decides to go nude in a photoshoot, movie, or something along those lines, her payment will be significantly less than what it would have been. That's why I think all these celebrities are going nude now.


I think your both right, but in KimK's case, I think she just wants to be "relevant" (She already has a sex tape and is stinking rich). But hey I'm not complaining lol.
mjones19
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 9:58 am

Re: Kim Kardashian (???) - Paper Magazine

Postby wip1968 » Thu Nov 13, 2014 12:36 pm

mjones19 wrote:
Ghost wrote:
wip1968 wrote:
Either that or they want to get naked on their own terms knowing they've got hacked nudes out there. By going nude publicly, they hope it will lower the value and interest of any hacked nudes that may release. We've seen Kim K., the recent Kiera Knightly for "Interview"...


Also so they can actually get paid for it. Imagine how much Jennifer Lawrence would have been paid for even one nude scene. If she ever decides to go nude in a photoshoot, movie, or something along those lines, her payment will be significantly less than what it would have been. That's why I think all these celebrities are going nude now.


I think your both right, but in KimK's case, I think she just wants to be "relevant" (She already has a sex tape and is stinking rich). But hey I'm not complaining lol.


That's why I used (???) when I try to identify what type of "celebrity" she is. She's definitely not an actress! Social media whore maybe? She must be going through her bucket list. Reality show? Check. Sex tape? Check. Topless Magazine Shoot. Check. :lol:
wip1968
 
Posts: 519
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 5:08 pm

Re: Kim Kardashian (???) - Paper Magazine

Postby Dylan1234 » Thu Nov 13, 2014 6:14 pm

I don't like how much she's been touched up here. Her waist is ridiculously tiny. She's so hot, there is no real reason to photoshop her body that much. With that being said, I have already fapped to these pics.
Dylan1234
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2014 4:35 am

Re: Kim Kardashian (???) - Paper Magazine

Postby wip1968 » Tue Nov 18, 2014 10:30 am

Buzzfeed "un-photoshopped" KimK's cover with what a realistic waist should be:

http://www.buzzfeed.com/lorynbrantz/if-kim-kardashian-had-realistic-waistlines?bftw=main

Image

Note: my posts/links are not my own albums. I source and simply repost what I find.
wip1968
 
Posts: 519
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 5:08 pm


Return to Non-Leaks

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest