The Fappening - Now a community!

Am i the only one who doesnt consider some of these leaks as actual leaks when we could see the same thing from their twitter, or facebook? I'm referring to the leaks that have no actual nudity, ones such as Kaya Scodelario, Chloe Bennett, Alaina Huffman, and a few others. While these women are rather hot, i still fail to see an actual "leak" of any sort. Anyone else out there agree? perhaps disagree?

You aren't - viewtopic.php?f=11&t=213

Personally, I don't really care. If the "star" doesn't interest me, I don't look at the folder anyway. It isn't like there are 15 new galleries being posted every day. It's, at most, a few a week as they are released. Eventually it'll drop to one or two, then none a week.

If the pics are from "private" cloud services, racy or not, I think they belong here since they weren't intended for our eyes. Therefore, they are technically leaks. Leaks doesn't necessarily only mean nude/racy.

If root wanted to make a notation on the main albums page that notes "Nudity", maybe that would be the way to go.

snapsnap wrote:If the pics are from "private" cloud services, racy or not, I think they belong here since they weren't intended for our eyes. Therefore, they are technically leaks. Leaks doesn't not necessarily only mean nude/racy.

This.

Also, some people might prefer seeing them clothed instead of nude. Don't ask me why, but some people might.

Sanity wrote:

snapsnap wrote:If the pics are from "private" cloud services, racy or not, I think they belong here since they weren't intended for our eyes. Therefore, they are technically leaks. Leaks doesn't not necessarily only mean nude/racy.

This.

Also, some people might prefer seeing them clothed instead of nude. Don't ask me why, but some people might.

Why?

No, I did it too. Sleep with all of them. Yes, even Matt Smith - wait, what am I SAYING??? ESPECIALLY Matt Smith. He seemed a bit hurt when I threatened to kick him out of bed if he so much as asked to be called 'Matthew', instead of The Doctor, and I had to slap him a few times before he agreed to use the sonic-screwdriver as a sex toy.

Knew I should have gone for John Simms instead - you can just tell he'd be right into the 'now, I'm going to bend you across that table, and you're going to BEG for more...because I AM THE MASTER!!!!'. Hell, he could even keep some of his lines from the show - 'What's. My. Name. Say it....SAY IT'

Oh whoops. Did I misread the thread again? Damn:-(

snapsnap wrote:You aren't - viewtopic.php?f=11&t=213

Personally, I don't really care. If the "star" doesn't interest me, I don't look at the folder anyway. It isn't like there are 15 new galleries being posted every day. It's, at most, a few a week as they are released. Eventually it'll drop to one or two, then none a week.

If the pics are from "private" cloud services, racy or not, I think they belong here since they weren't intended for our eyes. Therefore, they are technically leaks. Leaks doesn't necessarily only mean nude/racy.

If root wanted to make a notation on the main albums page that notes "Nudity", maybe that would be the way to go.

Besides, as nuch as it's a terrible breach of privacy and all that, for Kim Kardashian at least, it would be FAR more scandalous for her if photos that showed her dressing sensibly and not having sex on camera where ever to come to light.

Odin wrote:

Sanity wrote:

snapsnap wrote:If the pics are from "private" cloud services, racy or not, I think they belong here since they weren't intended for our eyes. Therefore, they are technically leaks. Leaks doesn't not necessarily only mean nude/racy.

This.

Also, some people might prefer seeing them clothed instead of nude. Don't ask me why, but some people might.

Why?

How dare you

Each to his/her own but I personally do not see the point in their boring holiday snaps.